Exciting Developments in the Medical Management of Cushing’s Disease

US Endocrinology, 2015;11(2):95–6 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2015.11.02.95

Abstract:

Until recently, there have been few options for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s disease who have failed surgery or have recurred. With the approval of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) of mifepristone and pasireotide, endocrinologists now have additional therapies they can consider for their Cushing’s disease patients. Each of these medications has its own positive characteristics and adverse effects so that patient-specific characteristics must be taken into account when deciding on a suitable medical therapy.
Keywords: Cushing’s disease, mifepristone, pasireotide
Disclosure: Susan L Samson, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FACE, has served on the advisory boards of Corcept Therapeutics and Novartis Pharmaceuticals and has been a site principal investigator for the SOM230 and LCI699 trials and has an investigator-initiated research grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals. No funding was received for the publication of this article.
Received: October 04, 2015 Published Online: October 25, 2015
Correspondence: Susan L Samson, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FACE, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, ABBR R615, Houston TX 77030, US. E: ssamson@bcm.edu
Open Access: This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit.
The following article was originally published for the US audience in European Endocrinology’s sister journal US Endocrinology and is being highlighted as we believe it will be of interest to our European readers.

In 1932, Dr Harvey Cushing published his findings on a series of patients with what he called the “killing disease,” revealing that the median survival for most of his patients was less than 5 years from diagnosis.1 With advances in surgical techniques and medical management of comorbidities, the standardized mortality ratio for patients with Cushing’s disease still is elevated two- to fivefold. The surgical remission rates for corticotroph adenomas are approximately 75 % for microadenomas and <50 % for macroadenomas, although this is dependent on the surgical center.2 Further, recurrence rates are substantial. Endocrinologists have been left with few options for the treatment of patients who have failed surgery or have recurred. Ketoconazole inhibits multiple steps in cortisol synthesis, but has been subject to a black box warning from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding potential for liver damage. Offlabel use of the dopamine agonist, cabergoline, has been shown to lower cortisol levels, but only in a subset of patients and, even then, some responders will escape from control and manifest elevated cortisol.3 At the extreme, adrenalectomy is an option but requires that there is good control of the pituitary adenoma, usually by prior treatment with radiotherapy, or there is risk of unchecked growth of the residual tumor cells, resulting in Nelson’s disease.

Three years ago, our armoury against Cushing’s disease was expanded with the regulatory approval of two pharmaceutical agents. Mifepristone (Korlym, Corcept Therapeutics) (previously known as RU486) is a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist that blocks the effects of cortisol at the tissue level. It was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2011 as an orphan drug for the treatment of endogenous hypercortisolemia. Shortly after, the FDA approved mifepristone for the treatment of hyperglycemia associated with hypercortisolemia. The second addition was pasireotide (Signifor, Novartis Pharmaceuticals), which is a somatostatin receptor agonist (SRA) approved by the EMA and FDA in 2012. Pasireotide has a strong affinity for somatostatin receptor 5, which enables it to inhibit adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion from corticotroph adenoma cells, unlike its predecessors octreotide and lanreotide. For Cushing’s disease patients who are out of options, both therapies have potential. However, the choice of the right therapy must take into account patient-specific characteristics and the positive features and adverse effects of both drugs.

Mifepristone
Mifepristone is capable of rapid improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of hypercortisolemia. The SEISMIC trial included subjects with Cushing’s syndrome of many etiologies: adrenocortical carcinoma, ectopic ACTH, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, and corticotroph adenomas.4 After 24 weeks of therapy, those subjects with a previous diagnosis of diabetes had improved glucose levels, including lowered fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and glucose excursions during glucose tolerance testing. Thus, the FDA approval was for the treatment of hypercortisolemia accompanied by hyperglycemia. Weight decreased and there were improvements in the scores of questionnaires designed to test for depression, cognition, and quality of life.

As mifepristone blocks cortisol feedback at the level of the corticotroph adenoma, the ACTH and cortisol levels rise two- to threefold,5 so determining clinical efficacy for dose titration can be challenging, and the clinician has to rely on surrogate markers, such as improvement in Cushing’s syndrome-related symptoms and signs as well as indirect laboratory markers, such as lowered glycated hemoglobin. Mifepristone can be so effective in blocking the glucocorticoid receptor that patients can present with symptoms reminiscent of adrenal insufficiency, including nausea and vomiting, fatigue, arthralgias, and dizziness, in spite of elevated cortisol.4 It is important that these symptoms are recognized and treated by holding the drug and administering moderate dose of dexamethasone (2–4 mg every 6–12 hours), rather than “weaker” glucocorticoids, in order to overcome the high affinity of mifepristone for the receptor. As mifepristone does not bind and inhibit the mineralocorticoid receptor, the increase in cortisol with therapy can lead to hypokalemia, hypertension, and peripheral edema. These consequences often can be managed with the addition of potassium supplements and spironolactone. Mifepristone also antagonizes the progesterone receptor so that premenopausal women can develop endometrial thickening and dysregulated vaginal bleeding. With the block in feedback on a residual corticotroph adenoma, there is a theoretical concern for unchecked growth, as is seen in Nelson’s syndrome. However, imaging data from the SEISMIC extension revealed that of 36 tumors, only four showed an increase in size and three of these enlarging tumors were invasive macroadenomas at baseline.5

Given the above discussion, the choice of mifepristone for a patient with Cushing’s disease must take into patient-specific characteristics. Positive considerations include the need for a fast clinical response, such as for a sick patient who needs to undergo a surgical procedure and patients with hyperglycemia or diabetes secondary to their Cushing’s syndrome. On the other hand, clinicians also must consider the menstrual or reproductive status of their female patients, the ability of the patient to adhere to important medications, such as potassium supplements, as well as the volume and aggressiveness of the residual tumor.

References:
1. Cushing H, The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations (pituitary basophilism). 1932, Obes Res, 1994;2:486–508.
2. Nieman LK, et al., Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2015;100:2807–31.
3. Pivonello R, et al., The medical treatment of Cushing’s disease: effectiveness of chronic treatment with the dopamine agonist cabergoline in patients unsuccessfully treated by surgery, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009;94:223–30.
4. Fleseriu M, et al., Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing’s syndrome, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012;97:2039–49.
5. Fleseriu M, et al., Changes in plasma ACTH levels and corticotroph tumor size in patients with Cushing’s disease during long-term treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014;99:3718–27.
6. Colao A, et al., A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing’s disease, N Engl J Med, 2012;366:914–24.
7. Simeoli C, et al., The treatment with pasireotide in Cushing’s disease: effects of long-term treatment on tumor mass in the experience of a single center, Endocrine, 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
8. Henry RR, et al., Hyperglycemia associated with pasireotide: results from a mechanistic study in healthy volunteers, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013;98:3446–53.
9. Breitschaft A, et al., Management of hyperglycemia associated with pasireotide (SOM230): healthy volunteer study, Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2014;103:458–65.
10. Colao A, et al., Managing hyperglycemia in patients with Cushing’s disease treated with pasireotide: medical expert recommendations, Pituitary, 2014;17:180–6.
11. Bertagna X, et al., LCI699, a potent 11beta-hydroxylase inhibitor, normalizes urinary cortisol in patients with Cushing’s disease: results from a multicenter, proof-of-concept study, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014;99:1375–83.
12. Fleseriu M, Medical treatment of Cushing disease: new targets, new hope, Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2015;44:51–70.
Keywords: Cushing’s disease, mifepristone, pasireotide