Fenofibrates and the Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk

Fenofibrates and the Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk

US Endocrine Disease 2006 Issue 2
Published: October 2008
dots

Population data indicate that at a TG value of 200mg/dl, the prevalence of subclass B is ~75% and when the TG is 100mg/dl, the prevalence of subclass B is ~18%.10 The threshold model would suggest that TG lowering will not substantially alter LDL subclass distribution if the TG level remains above the individual’s threshold for conversion from pattern B to pattern A. In our study, by pairing fenofibrate-treated subjects with on-treatment TG values <200 or ≥200mg/dl, we were able to isolate the influences of the TG value achieved from the degree of TG lowering.

The subset of patients with end-of-treatment TG ≥200mg/dl showed no increase in LDL particle diameter despite a median decline of >50% from baseline in TG concentration. In addition, very little increase in LDL particle diameter was observed in subjects with end-of-treatment TG values <200mg/dl in the absence of a conversion to LDL subclass pattern A. These results support the threshold model and go some way to explain the findings of the recently published Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, which failed to reach its primary end-point of reducing coronary heart disease events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The median baseline TG concentration in the FIELD study was approximately 153mg/dl, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the study sample may have had TG levels below the threshold for conversion to LDL subclass pattern B. To date, no data on LDL subclass distribution have been published from the FIELD study.However, results from previous outcomes studies have suggested that the greatest risk reduction with fibrate therapy occurs in subjects with TG >200mg/dl or 2.3mmol/l.9,11-13

One potential explanation for the greater risk reduction in those with hypertriglyceridemia, and for the failure of the FIELD study to demonstrate a reduction in risk for the primary outcome, is that the greatest benefit of fibrate therapy accrues to subjects in whom treatment induces a shift from LDL subclass pattern B to pattern A. For many patients with high or very high TG concentrations, a single agent will not reduce the TG level to a degree sufficient to induce a shift in LDL subclass distribution pattern. What is needed is a target TG level approach in the clinic. In a recent national survey of lipid management in clinical practice, 25% of patients receiving treatment for dyslipidemia had an on-treatment TG concentration ≥200mg/dl.14

References:
  1. Clin Cardiol (2006);29: pp. 268–273.
  2. Lemieux I, Laperrière L, Dzavik V, et al., Atherosclerosis (2002);162(2): pp. 363–371.
  3. Frost RJ, Otto C, Geiss HC, et al., Am J Cardiol (2001);87(1): pp. 44–48.
  4. Ikewaki K,Tohyama J, Nakata Y, et al., J Atheroscler Thromb (2004);11: pp. 278–285.
  5. Vakkilainen J, Steiner G, Ansquer JC, et al., DAIS Group, Circulation (2003);107(13): pp. 1733–1737.
  6. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J Am Med Assoc (2001);285: pp. 2486–2497.Accessed on June 10, 2005 at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3_rpt.htm.
  7. Packard CJ, Biochem Soc Trans (2003);31(Pt 5): pp. 1066–1069.
  8. Austin MA, King MC,Vranizan KM, Krauss RM, Circulation (199)0;82(2): pp. 495–506.
  9. Robins SJ, Collins D,Wittes JT, et al., for the VA-HIT Study Group, J Am Med Assoc (2001);285: pp. 1585–1591.
  10. Superko HR, Prev Cardiol (1998);1: pp. 16–24.
  11. Secondary prevention by raising HDL cholesterol and reducing triglycerides in patients with coronary artery disease: The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study, Circulation (2000);102: pp. 21–27.
  12. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al., Helsinki Heart Study, N Engl J Med (1987);317: pp. 1237–1245.
  13. Manninen V,Tenkanen L, Koskinen P, et al., Circulation (1992);85: pp. 37–45.
  14. Davidson MH, Maki KC, Pearson TA, et al., Am J Cardiol (2005);96(4): pp. 556–563.

Copyright® 2004 - 2010 Business Briefings, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Touch Endocrinology is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatement recommendations.