submit to the journals

Reporting on Glucose Control Metrics in the Intensive Care Unit

European Endocrinology, 2015;11(2):75–8 DOI:


The ‘diabetes of injury’ typically associated with critical illness has recently been thoroughly revisited and much better characterised following major therapeutic advances. The occurrence of severe hyperglycaemia, moderate hypoglycaemia or high glycaemic variability has been associated with an increased mortality and rate of complications in large independent cohorts of acutely ill patients. Hence, current guidelines advocate the prevention and avoidance of each of these three dysglycaemic domains, and the use of a common metrics for a quantitative description of dysglycaemic events, such as the proportion of time spent in the target glycaemic range as a unifying variable. Using a common language will help to face the future challenges, including the definition of the most appropriate blood glucose (BG) target according to the category of admission, the time interval from the initial injury and the medical history. The clinical testing of technological improvements in the monitoring systems and the therapeutic algorithms should be assessed using the same metrics.
Keywords: Critically ill, stress hyperglycaemia, diabetes of injury, stress response, insulin, blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Disclosure: Rafael Machado Tironi and Jean-Charles Preiser have no conflicts of interest to declare. No funding was received for the publication of this article.
Open Access: This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit.
Received: June 17, 2015 Accepted July 16, 2015
Correspondence: Jean-Charles Preiser, Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Universite libre de Bruxelles, 808 route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. E:

Acute illness is typically associated with the so-called ‘stress-induced hyperglycaemia’, defined as a transient hyperglycaemia in patients without previous evidence of diabetes.1 The strong relationship between stress hyperglycaemia and poor outcome is largely established and actually validates hyperglycaemia as a marker of illness severity.

The correction of a moderate stress hyperglycaemia may improve the prognosis. Indeed, in 2001, a large single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) in critically ill surgical patients demonstrated that tight glucose control (TGC) (defined as the restoration and maintenance of blood glucose [BG] concentration between 4.4 and 6.1 mmol/l [80 and 110 mg/l]) by intensive insulin therapy (IIT) was associated with decreased mortality and rate of complications.2 However, subsequent studies performed in other intensive care units (ICUs)3–8 failed to reproduce the beneficial effects of IIT titrated to achieve TGC.9 The controversy that followed these conflicting results triggered a major interest in the physiopathology of stress response, resulting in important findings and a re-appraisal of the current knowledge.

This review intends to provide a brief summary of the current understanding of the toxicity of prolonged hyperglycaemia, the mechanisms underlying the three domains of dysglycaemia, that is, hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia and high glycaemic variability (GV), and the available clinical data from observational and interventional studies, and to outline some of the challenges for the future of the field.

Prolonged Hyperglycaemia-associated Toxicity

In stress conditions, an overall massive glucose overload happens in organs where glucose uptake is not regulated by insulin, usually quoted as non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake (NIMGU) tissues, under the influence of pro-inflammatory mediators, counterregulatory hormones, and hypoxia.10 Hence, a wide range of tissues, including hepatocytes, endothelial cells, neurons, nephrons and immune cells, may be susceptible to enhanced glucose toxicity as a result of acute illness. Several deleterious effects have been associated with these high glucose concentrations in cells.1,11 Damage to mitochondrial proteins occurs and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is increased as a consequence of the shift from glycolysis towards accessory metabolic pathways (pentose phosphate, hexosamines, polyols).12 Other effects of excess glucose concentrations include the exacerbation of inflammatory pathways, decreased complement activity, modifications in the innate immune system, impairment in endothelial and hepatic mitochondrial functions and abolishment of the ischaemic preconditioning and protein glycosylation. Acute complications attributed to stress hyperglycaemia include renal failure, increased susceptibility to infections, polyneuropathy and impaired microcirculation.1

1. Dungan KM, Braithwaite SS, Preiser JC, Stress hyperglycaemia, Lancet, 2009;23:1798–807.
2. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al., Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients, N Engl J Med, 2001;345:1359–67.
3. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al., Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU, N Engl J Med, 2006;3545:449–61.
4. Arabi YM, Dabbagh OC, Tamin HM, et al., Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients, Crit Care Med, 2008;36:3190–7.
5. De la Rosa GC, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, et al., Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalized in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial, Crit Care, 2008;12:R120.
6. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, et al., Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis? N Engl J Med, 2008;358:125–39.
7. Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, et al., A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study, Intensive Care Med, 2009;35:1738–48.
8. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, et al., Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients, N Engl J Med, 2009;360:1283–97.
9. Marik P, Preiser JC, Toward understanding tight glycemic control in the ICU: a systematic review and metaanalysis, Chest, 2010;137:544–51.
10. Lena D, Kalfon P, Preiser JC, Ichai C, Glycemic control in the intensive care unit and during the postoperative period, Anesthesiology, 2011;114:438–44.
11. Brownlee M, Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications, Nature, 2001;414:813–20.
12. Bagry HS, Raghavendran S, Carli F, Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Perioperative considerations, Anesthesiology, 2008;108:506–23.
13. Marik PE, Bellomo R, Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response, Crit Care, 2013;17:305.
14. Sicardi SZ, Rodhe P, Hahn G, Progressive decrease in glucose clearance during surgery, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006;50:848–54.
15. Cryer PE, Mechanisms of sympathoadrenal failure and hypoglycemia in diabetes, J Clin Invest, 2006;116:1470–3.
16. Lacherade JC, Jacqueminet S, Preiser JC, An overview of hypoglycemia in the critically ill, Diabetes Sci Technol, 2009;3:1242–9.
17. Preiser JC, Ichai C, Orban JC, Groeneveld AB, Metabolic response to the stress of critical illness, Br J Anaesth, 2014;113:945–54.
18. Risso A, Mercury F, Quagliaro L, et al., Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells in culture, Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2001;281:E924–30.
19. Collier B, Dossett LA, May AK, Diaz JJ, Glucose control and the inflammatory response, Nutr Clin Pract, 2008;23:3–15.
20. Otto NM, Schindler R, Lun A, et al., Hyperosmotic stress enhances cytokine production and decreases phagocytosis in vitro, Crit Care, 2008;12:R107.
21. Van den Berghe G, Schoonheydt K, Becx P, et al., Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients, Neurology, 2005;64:1348–53.
22. Krinsley JS, Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients, Mayo Clin Proc, 2004;79:992–1000.
23. Finney SJ, Zekveld C, Elia A, Evans TW, Glucose control and mortality in critically ill patients, JAMA, 2003;290:2041–7.
24. Falciglia M, Freyberg RW, Almenoff PL, et al., Hyperglycemiarelated mortality in critically ill patients varies with admission diagnosis, Crit Care Med, 2009;37:1–9.
25. Badawi O, Waite MD, Fuhrman SA, Zuckerman IH, Association between intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia and in-hospital mortality, Crit Care Med, 2012;40:3180–8.
26. Furnary AP, Wu Y, Eliminating the diabetic disadvantage: the Portland Diabetic Project, Semin Thor Cardiovasc Surg, 2006;18:302–8.
27. D’Alessandro C, Leprince P, Golmard JL, et al., Strict glycemic control reduces EuroSCORE expected mortality in diabetic patients undergoing myocardial revascularization, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007;134:29–37.
28. Ouattara A, Lecompte P, Le Manach Y, et al., Poor intraoperative blood glucose control is associated with a worsened hospital outcome after cardiac surgery in diabetic patients, Anesthesiology, 2005;103:687–94.
29. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators, Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients, N Engl J Med, 2012;367:1108–18. 30. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, et al., Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients, Mayo Clin Proc, 2010;85:217–24.
31. Krinsley JS, Schultz MJ, Spronk PE, et al., Mild hypoglycemia is independently associated with increased mortality in the critically ill, Crit Care, 2011;15:R173.
32. Vriesendorp TM, van Santen S, DeVries JH, et al., Predisposing factors for hypoglycemia in the intensive care unit, Crit Care Med, 2006;34:96–101.
33. Arabi YM, Tamim HM, Rishu AH, Hypoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: predisposing factors and association with mortality, Crit Care Med, 2009;37:2536–44.
34. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, et al., Variability of blood glucose concentration and short-term mortality in critically ill patients, Anesthesiology, 2006;105:244–52.
35. Dossett LA, Cao H, Mowery NT, et al., Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit, Ann Surg, 2008;74:679–85.
36. Krinsley JS, Glycemic variability: a strong independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients, Crit Care Med, 2008;36:3008–13.
37. Donati A, Damiani E, Domizi R, et al., Glycaemic variability, infections and mortality in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc, 2014;16:13–23.
38. Mackenzie I, Whitehouse T, Nightingale P, The metrics of glycaemic control in critical care, Intensive Care Med, 2011;37:435–43.
39. Krinsley JS, Preiser JC, Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults, Crit Care, 2015;19:179.
40. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, et al., Blood glucose concentration and outcome of critical illness: the impact of diabetes, Crit Care Med, 2008;36:2249–55.
41. Rady MY, Johnson DJ, Patel BM, et al., Influence of individual characteristics on outcome of glycemic control in intensive care unit patients with or without diabetes mellitus, Mayo Clin Proc, 2005;80:1558–67.
42. Kosiborod M, Rathore SS, Inzucchi SE, et al., Admission glucose and mortality in elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: implications for patients with and without recognized diabetes, Circulation, 2005;111:3078–86.
43. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Milants I, et al., Intensive insulin therapy in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units: benefit versus harm, Diabetes, 2006;55:3151–9.
44. Plummer MP, Bellomo R, Cousins CE, et al., Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality, Intensive Care Med, 2014;40:973–80.
45. Moghissi SE, Korythowski MT, DiNardo M, et al., American Association of clinical endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycaemic control, Endocr Pract, 2009;15:1–17.
46. Ichai C, Preiser JC, On behalf of the Steering Committee, the Expert panel, International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients, Crit Care, 2010;14:R166.
47. Jacobi J, Bircher N, Krinsley J, et al., Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients, Crit Care Med, 2012;40:3251–76.
48. Finfer S, Wernerman J, Preiser JC, et al., Clinical review: consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults, Crit Care, 2013;17:229.
49. Eslami S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E, et al., A systematic review on quality indicators for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: need for an unambiguous indicator reference subset, Crit Care, 2008;12:R139.
50. Penning S, Chase JG, Preiser JC, et al., Does the achievement of an intermediate glycemic target reduce organ failure and mortality? A post hoc analysis of the Glucontrol trial, J Crit Care, 2014;29:374–9.
51. Penning S, Pretty C, Preiser JC, et al., Glucose control positively influences patient outcome: a retrospective study, J Crit Care, 2015;30:455–9.
Keywords: Critically ill, stress hyperglycaemia, diabetes of injury, stress response, insulin, blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)