Filter Specialty
Submit To The Journals

Sodium-glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes—a Dangerous Ally

US Endocrinology, 2017;13(2):75–8 DOI:


There is an unmet need for adjunctive non-insulin-based therapies in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Weight gain, recurrent hypoglycemia and suboptimal glycemic control remain significant challenges. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dual inhibitors of sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 (SGLT1) and SGLT2 may have a potential role as an add-on therapy to insulin. The benefits include improved glycemic control, weight reduction, and reduced insulin dose requirement. However, the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors is significant and the diagnosis may be delayed due to absence of significant hyperglycemia. At present, SGLT2 inhibitors are not approved for use in T1D, and the risks should be discussed at length with the patient. We propose strategies to minimize the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis associated with off-label use of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1D.


Type 1 diabetes, diabetic ketoacidosis, euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors


Gagan Priya, Sanjay Kalra, and Vishal Bhambri have nothing to declare in relation to this article. No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Open Access

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit.


September 04, 2017




Gagan Priya, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, India. E:

There is a rising trend of overweight and obesity in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The prevalence of overweight and obesity among newly diagnosed T1D subjects was 21–22% in the 2–19 year age group in the Pediatric Diabetes Consortium and the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study.1,2 This has been attributed to a general worldwide increase in prevalence of obesity and similar risk factors such as family history, ethnicity, and sedentary lifestyle may be contributory. But several other factors related to insulin treatment may further exacerbate weight gain. Hypoglycemia and defensive snacking result in a state of calorie excess. Over-insulinization to achieve glycemic targets compounds the problem. In the DCCT (NCT00360815) and EDIC (NCT00360893) trials, excessive weight gain was associated with an increase in central obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.3 Approximately 50% patients with T1D have features of metabolic syndrome.4

Is there a need for adjunctive therapy in type 1 diabetes?

T1D is caused by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells and consequent absolute insulin deficiency. Insulin, therefore, remains the cornerstone of treatment. However, despite significant advances in the availability of more physiological insulin preparations, insulin delivery devices including continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, most patients fail to achieve glycemic targets.5 There are periods of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia with marked daily fluctuations in blood glucose. Weight gain associated with insulin, severe hypoglycemia, recurrent hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, and poor postprandial glycemic control remain significant challenges.

Non-insulin anti-diabetic medications have often been considered as adjunctive to insulin therapy to improve metabolic control in T1D.6 The aim of such adjunctive therapy would be:

  • to improve glycemic control;
  • to minimize weight gain;
  • to reduce insulin dose requirement;
  • to improve postprandial glucose control; and
  • to improve cardiovascular and renal risk.

Drugs which have been explored for their role in T1D, with limited success, include pramlintide, metformin, pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors and dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitors.5,6 Pramlintide, an amylin analogue, is the only drug currently approved for use as adjunctive therapy in T1D. Trials of GLP1 receptor agonists have demonstrated small reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels accompanied by weight loss and reduced insulin dose but a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia.6,7 In the recently published multicentre trial with metformin in T1D adults with high cardiovascular risk (REMOVAL; NCT01483560), metformin demonstrated reductions in body weight, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and maximal carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), though the mean cIMT (primary outcome) was not affected.8

Rationale for use of Sodium-glucose
Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce renal glucose reabsorption and promote glucouresis and natriuresis. In trials of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, they have demonstrated significant glucose-lowering efficacy and moderate reductions in blood pressure, lipids, uric acid, and body weight (predominantly loss of fat mass). These benefits have been demonstrated even when SGLT2 inhibitors have been used as add-on to insulin therapy in T2D, with no increased risk of hypoglycemia and an attenuation of insulin-related weight gain. Long-term outcome studies and real-world data have suggested that they have cardio-protective and potential reno-protective benefits in patients with high cardiovascular risk.9 Since the mechanism of action does not depend on endogenous insulin secretion and there are multiple pleiotropic benefits, SGLT2 inhibition is an attractive target in T1D management, as adjunctive to insulin. Likely benefits are better glycemic control, reduced insulin dose requirements, weight and blood pressure reduction, reduction in insulin resistance and possible cardio-protection and reno-protection.

Clinical evidence with sodium-glucose
co-transporter-2 inhibitors in type 1 diabetes

In animal models of T1D, SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated glucose-lowering effects. Empagliflozin increased urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and improved glycemic control in streptozotocin-induced T1D rats.10,11 In T1D mice, empagliflozin treatment significantly improved glucose tolerance with improvements in mRNA and serum insulin levels.10. The authors hypothesized that empagliflozin may help in the preservation of β-cell mass, evidenced by reduction in β-cell apoptosis and stimulation of β-cell proliferation, possibly due to protection of β-cells from glucotoxicity-induced oxidative stress.

Several small pilot studies of SGLT2 inhibitors and real-world case reports suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors improve glycemic control in T1D.12 Dapagliflozin increased UGE by 72–88 g per 24 hours in a dose ranging
study in 70 T1D adults with reduction in daily insulin dose requirements by 16.2–19.3%.13,14 There were significant reductions in 24-hour average glucose and glycemic variability, without any unexpected short-term safety concerns over 2 weeks.13,14 In another 24-week study in T1D subjects, dapagliflozin reduced fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides with no significant adverse events.15 Similar benefits were seen when dapagliflozin was added to ongoing insulin and liraglutide therapy.16

Empagliflozin significantly lowered 24-hour UGE in 75 T1D individuals. Compared to placebo, the HbA1c reduction was -0.35 to -0.49%, total daily insulin dose was reduced by -0.07 to -0.09 U/kg, and weight reduction was -1.5 to -1.9 kg. The rate of symptomatic hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia requiring assistance was not increased.17 The 24-hour mean glucose area under curve was significantly reduced, compared to placebo: adjusted mean difference was -30.2 mg/dl/h (95% confidence interval [CI] -42.2 to -18.2) with empagliflozin 10 mg and -33.0 mg/dl/h (95% CI -44.8 to -21.1) with empagliflozin 25 mg. Glucose variability was significantly decreased, time spent in target glucose range was increased and there was no increase in time spent in hypoglycemia.18

In an 18-week, phase 2 study including 351 patients on multiple daily injections or CSII, canagliflozin was associated with decreases in HbA1c, insulin dose and body weight.19 Eighty-nine of these participants underwent CGM and canagliflozin use was associated with improved indices of glycemic variability.20 In another CGM study, significant reductions in mean blood glucose, CGM standard deviation, time spent in hyperglycemia, HbA1c, weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and total daily insulin dose were reported in 27 patients with canagliflozin as add-on to insulin.21 Similar benefits have been reported with ipragliflozin and remogliflozin in small pilot studies.14,22

In a recent meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials including 178 patients, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with reduction in fasting blood glucose and insulin dosage, with no significant risk of urinary tract infections, genital infections or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).23 In another systematic review of all studies published till March 2017, SGLT2 inhibitors led to overall reduction of HbA1c (up to 0.49%) and weight (up to 2.7 kg) and lower total daily insulin dose, with lower incidence of hypoglycemia.24

Empagliflozin resulted in a decrease in arterial stiffness in young patients with T1D.25 In another study, empagliflozin significantly reduced renal hyperfiltration, with decline in plasma nitric oxide (NO) and effective renal plasma flow over 8 weeks.26 In a mouse model (Akita mice) of T1D, dapagliflozin resulted in significant reduction in mesangial matrix expansion and renal interstitial fibrosis, along with reduction in hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress, compared to insulin.14,27 In T2D outcome trials, empagliflozin and canagliflozin have demonstrated cardio-protection and reno-protection. This leads to the hope that SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce nephropathy progression and cardiovascular risk in T1D as well.

However, most studies have been of short duration and small sample size, and no conclusions can be made about the long-term efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1D. There are limited data that SGLT2 inhibitors improve average glucose and glycemic variability, reduce postprandial hyperglycemia, promote weight reduction, and reduce total daily insulin dose requirement without increased risk of hypoglycemia in T1D.

Safety concerns—risk of diabetic ketoacidosis

SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and volume depletion. Recent studies in T2D have raised concerns about their long-term effects on bone health and increased risk of fractures and lower extremity amputations, as seen with canagliflozin. An assessment of the impact of chronic SGLT2 inhibition on bone health and amputation risk in T1D is especially pertinent as these patients are at high risk of osteoporosis, fractures, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and amputations.28,29

Most importantly, there has been growing concern about the increased risk of ketoacidosis associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. In animal studies, phlorizin induced hyperketonemia in rats and decreased the renal clearance of acetoacetate in dogs. Ipragliflozin led to significant increase in free fatty acid (FFA) and β-hydroxybutyrate levels in obese mice fed on a high-fat diet. Tofogliflozin caused a dose-dependent increase in acetoacetate and β-hydroxybutyrate levels in patients with T2D.30

In an 8-week study of empagliflozin in T1D, 5% patients were withdrawn from the study when they developed diabetic ketoacidosis. Similarly, an increased incidence of ketoacidosis has been reported with canagliflozin (5.1% with canagliflozin100 mg and 9.4% with canagliflozin 300 mg versus 0% with placebo) in T1D trials. Predisposing factors included concurrent infection, insulin pump failure or missed insulin doses.31 In a phase 2 study of 2 weeks with dapagliflozin, a dose reduction in daily insulin dose of more than 20% was associated with higher β-hydroxybutyrate levels at days 7 and 14.32 In another trial, dapagliflozin was associated with significant increases in FFA, acetoacetate and β-hydroxybutyrate levels.16 Dapagliflozin increased the β-hydroxybutyrate levels to 0.6–1.0 mmol/L in 6 out of 33 T1D patients during the study period of 24 hours.33

There have been several case reports of SGLT2 inhibitor-associated DKA in individuals with both T1D and T2D. In several of these reports, hyperglycemia has not been marked, often leading to a delay in detection of DKA. This entity of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis has previously been reported with decreased carbohydrate intake, alcohol consumption, and during pregnancy. In May 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning about the increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2 inhibitors. In a recent review of FDA adverse event reporting data, the authors found 46, 144, and 450 reports of ketoacidosis associated with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin.34 There have been some case reports from southeast Asian countries35,36 and reports of ketonemia and ketonuria in patients from India.37,38

Dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and
sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors

Sotagliflozin is a dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor, under development for use as adjunctive therapy in T1D.39 SGLT1 mediates the intestinal absorption of glucose and galactose and renal glucose reabsorption distal to SGLT2 effect. Thus, sotagliflozin reduces renal glucose reabsorption via SGLT2 inhibition and glucose absorption from the gastrointestinal tract via SGLT1 inhibition. Inhibition of SGLT1 thus reduces postprandial glucose excursions and also stimulates the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) and polypeptide YY (PYY), which offers further therapeutic benefits.40

In small pilot studies over 4–12 weeks, sotagliflozin improved glycemic control with significant improvements in pre- and post-meal glucose levels without increase in hypoglycemic events, documented by CGM. The reduction in post-meal glucose was associated with reduction in bolus insulin doses, not seen earlier with empagliflozin or dapagliflozin.39,41 DKA events were higher with sotagliflozin. In a recent international phase 3 double blind randomized trials in patients with T1D using multiple subcutaneous insulin or pump therapy, the in Tandem 2 study (782 participants), the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin 400 mg, sotagliflozin 200 mg versus placebo was assessed over 52 weeks. There was statistically significant lowering of HbA1c (-0.49% with sotagliflozin 400 mg, -0.43% with sotagliflozin 200 mg and -0.08% with placebo) with increased risk of genital mycotic infections and diarrhea events. The incidence of DKA was higher with sotagliflozin (3.1% with sotagliflozin 400 mg, 1.1% with sotagliflozin 200 mg and 0% with placebo).42

Mechanism for diabetic ketoacidosis

SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the risk of DKA in T1D both directly and indirectly.30,43 SGLT2 inhibitor use may lead to deceptively lower blood glucose values and prompt inappropriate reduction in insulin doses to mitigate the risk of hypoglycemia. Resultant insulinopenia increases lipolysis, FFA release and ketogenesis. SGLT2 inhibitors lower the renal threshold for glucose to 70 mg/dl, causing large amounts of glucose to be lost in urine. Therefore, blood glucose values may not be significantly elevated in patients with DKA, with the potential risk of a delay in diagnosis.

SGLT2 inhibitors may decrease the renal clearance of ketone bodies with increase in plasma ketone levels. Phlorizin was shown to promote renal tubular reabsorption of acetoacetate in dogs, but the clearance of β-hydroxybutyrate was not measured.44 If SGLT2 inhibitors delay renal clearance of ketones, this may further delay the diagnosis of DKA.

Glucouresis may lead to compensatory rise in plasma glucagon levels, resulting in increased gluconeogenesis and FFA release. SGLT2 is expressed in pancreatic α-cells, and SGLT2 inhibitors increase glucagon secretion directly through ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel activation.45 The resultant increase in glucagon/insulin ratio further promotes ketogenesis.30 Figure 1 delineates the potential mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the risk of ketoacidosis in patients with T1D.

In most cases reported so far there were clear precipitating factors which could have triggered the ketoacidotic state. The risk factors described include: T1D/latent autoimmune diabetes or significant insulinopenia in T2D, insulin omission, or significant dose reduction, severe acute illness, surgery, trauma, alcohol intake, extensive exercise, dehydration, or low carbohydrate diet.46–48

How to minimize the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors

The off-label use of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1D is increasing, despite the lack of adequate safety data, and this is a cause for concern. There is no experience with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the pediatric population and it should not be used in such settings at all. Any use of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1D, at present, is off-label and the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis along with the lack of long-term safety data must be discussed at length with the patient.49 If their use is being considered at all, the practitioner should be very cautious and ensure appropriate patient education. There is also a need for all healthcare practitioners to keep a high index of suspicion for DKA in any patient using SGLT2 inhibitors and presenting with an acute medical or surgical illness. This is true even for those patients in whom blood glucose is apparently lower than one would expect in DKA, since euglycemic DKA has been frequently reported in such patients. In Table 1, we recommend strategies to minimize the risk of DKA associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. These strategies will be useful in T2D patients as well.


While SGLT2 inhibitors have the potential to improve glycemic control, reduce insulin dose requirements and reduce insulin-associated weight gain, the risk of DKA must be considered and adequate measures taken to prevent its occurrence. Any use of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1D is off-label and the risks must be discussed with the patient.

  • Touch Medical Media Limited, trading as Touch Medical Media, is a private limited company registered in England and Wales at The White House, Mill Road, Goring, Reading, England, RG8 9DD with registered number 08197142. © 2019 All rights reserved.

    touchendocrinology is for informational purposes and intended for healthcare professionals only. Its content should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations.