Continuous glucose monitoring, insulin therapy, type 1 diabetes
John B Buse’s contracted consulting fees are paid to the University of North Carolina by Adocia, AstraZeneca, Dance Biopharm, Eli Lilly, MannKind, NovaTarg, Novo Nordisk, Senseonics, vTv Therapeutics, and Zafgen and he receives grant support from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and vTv Therapeutics. He is a consultant to Neurimmune AG. He holds stock options in Mellitus Health, PhaseBio, and Stability Health. He is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002489).
Medical writing assistance was provided by Katrina Mountfort of Touch Medical Media and was supported by Touch Medical Media.
This is an expert interview and as such has not undergone the journal’s usual peer review process but has been approved by the editorial board.
The named author meets the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and has given final approval for the version to be published.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction provided the original author and source are given appropriate credit. © The Author 2018.
October 09, 2018
November 19, 2018
John B Buse, 8025 Burnett Womack Building, Campus Box # 7172 UNC-CH Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7170, US. E: firstname.lastname@example.org
No funding was received in the publication of this article.
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a substantial health burden worldwide, with approximately 1.35 million American children and adults living with T1D in 2015.1 Current guidelines from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommend an intensive insulin regimen for the treatment of T1D,2 on the basis of long-term clinical evidence.3 While the benefits of insulin are not disputed, the multiple injections and adverse effects result in a substantial treatment burden for patients. In particular, weight gain and the risk for hypoglycemia can cause increased comorbidities and poor compliance.4 While T1D is still associated with considerable premature mortality, there is reason for optimism, with a recent report of improved life expectancy in the US.5
In an expert interview, Dr Buse discusses recent advances in the management of T1D and their implications for clinical practice.
Q. What have been the most significant recent developments in the area of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes?
Flash glucose monitors have been extremely popular among patients who don’t want the burden of the alarms that are found in standard glucose monitors. They use the flash device many times a day, more than they would have used finger prick devices. I also think that the new DexCom G6 continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system has the advantage of not requiring calibration. Some of my patients still feel the need to calibrate, which is fine, but they feel that the entire platform has been improved for them.
Q. What are the limitations of insulin use in patients with type 1 diabetes?
The management of T1D requires a patient to pay attention 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for the rest of their lives—a huge burden, and many patients feel that they need a break. Most patients do not achieve their glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets, sometimes because of lack of access to the highest quality care. Severe hypoglycemia is a major burden to patients with T1D and is a greater danger than the risk for blindness and renal failure, at least in the short term. Weight gain is a problem. Also, variable glucose values are experienced, which patients sense as a feeling of being unwell. People with T1D are doing much better today than they were 10–15 years ago, but we still haven’t perfected the management of the condition.
Q. What adjunctive treatments to insulin are currently in use in type 1 diabetes?
We now have devices such as insulin pumps and CGMs that are often linked together as low glucose suspend systems, or sensor-augmented pump therapy where much of the glucose management is done by the device with assistance from the patient.
With regards to medications beyond insulin, in the US we have pramlintide, which has to be injected with each meal. It is associated with modest improvements in HbA1c but also a modestly increased risk for severe hypoglycaemia.6 It has been noticed in the US that, over time, the effects tend to wane and many patients who have tried pramlintide do not continue in the long term.
A lot of work is being done on the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 and SGLT-1/-2 inhibitors that shows substantial promise, with HbA1c reductions around 0.4%, a trend towards reduced risk for hypoglycemia, weight loss, reduced glycemic variability, and blood pressure reductions.7–9 There is a small but significant increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis and we need to learn how to mitigate that risk. The SGLT-inhibition process seems a very promising approach in T1D.
Some people believe that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists could play a role in improving T1D care, but larger clinical trials haven’t demonstrated consistent benefits and have had some suggestions of potential harm. Smaller studies have suggested benefits.10–12
A lot of small studies have been performed with metformin and sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and alpha glucosidase inhibitors, which have provided no clear evidence of benefit but have suggested modest effects.13
Q. What were the key findings of the inTandem1 and inTandem2 studies of sotagliflozin in patients with type 1 diabetes?
The inTandem1 and inTandem2 studies are regulatory studies for patients with T1D who are inadequately controlled with insulin pumps or multiple daily injections. We studied the effects of two doses of sotagliflozin with HbA1c as a primary endpoint. The average HbA1c reduction was around 0.4% and this benefit was achieved with greater time in range by CGM, reduction in hypoglycemia, moderate reduction in weight (around 3–4 kg), and improvements in blood pressure. These were broad-based improvements in a variety of outcome measures that patients are interested in. Other patient-reported outcomes suggested a reduction in diabetes distress and a general sense of feeling better, most likely due to a decreased variability in glucose levels.7
Q. Which other adjunctive therapies are being investigated for type 1 diabetes?
Insulin pumps, CGM, and SGLT inhibitors are the areas of greatest research at present. There are some additional medications that are being evaluated. GLP-1 receptor agonists were in phase III development, particularly liraglutide, as discussed above, but that program has been suspended.14 There is a great deal of interest in preventing or delaying the progression of beta cell loss in T1D through a variety of immunotherapies and that work is ongoing.15 Islet replacement therapy in combination with tactics to prevent beta-cell destruction is the most nascent field.16
Q. Which presentations/data have interested you most at this year’s American Diabetes Association conference?
There was a lot of information about pumps and sensors and their role in T1D. There were a number of presentations around the SGLT2 inhibitors. There was a relatively small study presented by Dr Dandona that suggested benefits from GLP-1 agonists.17
In type 2 diabetes (T2D) there are some upcoming disclosures that are very exciting and hopefully we will hear about them at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes meeting, but there have been some press releases suggesting a great deal of excitement around the SGLT2 inhibitors, in the setting of both T1D and T2D. This is a continuing area of ongoing investigation and the prognosis for patients with diabetes has never been better.