Liver Disorders
Read Time: 15 mins

Resmetirom: An Orally Administered, Small-molecule, Liver-directed, β-selective THR Agonist for the Treatment of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Copy Link
Published Online: May 19th 2023 touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology. 2023;19(1):60-70 DOI:
Authors: Gres Karim, Meena B Bansal
Quick Links:
Article Information

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a spectrum of fatty liver disease, including nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and its more progressive form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The prevalence of NAFLD/NASH along with type 2 diabetes and obesity is rising worldwide. In those who develop NASH, unlike those with bland steatosis (NAFL), lipotoxic lipids drive hepatocyte injury, inflammation and stellate cell activation leading to progressive accumulation of collagen or fibrosis, ultimately leading to cirrhosis and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hypothyroidism is associated with NAFLD/NASH; specifically, intrahepatic hypothyroidism drives lipotoxicty in preclinical models. Agonists of thyroid hormone receptor (THR)β, which is primarily found in the liver, can promote lipophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy, stimulating increased hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation, and thereby decreasing the burden of lipotoxic lipids, while promoting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake and favourable effects on lipid profiles. A number of THRβ agonists are currently being investigated for NASH. This review focuses on resmetirom, an orally administered, once-daily, small-molecule, liver-directed, ß-selective THR agonist, as it is furthest along in development. Data from completed clincal studies outlined in this review demonstrate that resmetirom is effective in reducing hepatic fat content as measured by magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction, reduces liver enzymes, improves non-invasive markers of liver fibrogenesis and decreases liver stiffness, while eliciting a favourable cardiovascular profile with a reduction in serum lipids, including LDL cholesterol. Topline phase III biopsy data showed resolution of NASH and/or fibrosis improvement after 52 weeks of treatment, with more detailed peerreviewed findings anticipated in order to certify these findings. Longer term clinical outcomes from both MAESTRO-NASH and MAESTRO-NASH OUTCOMES will be a pivotal juncture in the drug’s road towards being approved as a NASH therapeutic.


resmetirom, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatic steatosis, hepatic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, liver stiffness, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, THR-β


Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a spectrum of fatty liver diseases, including nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).1 NAFLD is associated with metabolic disorders, including obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypothyroidism and metabolic syndrome.2 The diagnosis of NAFLD requires 5% histologic or imaging evidence of hepatic steatosis, with exclusion of secondary causes of hepatic steatosis, such as significant alcohol consumption, hereditary disorders and steatogenic medications.1 NASH, the more severe and progressive form of the disease, is characterized by inflammation and hepatocyte injury (ballooning) with or without hepatic fibrosis.1

Our understanding of the natural history of NAFLD and NASH continues to evolve. In a seminal paired liver biopsy study with a mean follow-up of 13.7 years, Ekstedt et al. conducted a biopsy study found that 16% of patients with NAFLD showed improvement in fibrosis, 43% remained stable, 41% showed fibrosis progression and 5% developed cirrhosis-related complications, thus providing relevant insight into the natural history of NASH with no intervention.3 NASH is a heterogenous disease, so multiple factors, including genetic determinants, environmental factors and comorbidities, interact to promote fibrosis progression in specific individuals. Ultimately, fibrosis is the most important predictor of clinical outcomes4 and thus represents an important endpoint in clinical trials, while longer-term follow-up can be done to assess clinical outcomes.

The global prevalence of NAFLD is estimated to be 25%, with the highest prevalence in the Middle East and South America and the lowest in Africa.5 It is thought to affect 55.5% of individuals with T2DM6 and 7080% of patients with obesity worldwide.7 The global prevalence of NASH is about 5%, and among those with T2DM, the prevalence is estimated at 37.3%6 and 33.5% among individuals who are overweight or obese.8 In USANorth America, the prevalence of NAFLD is estimated to be about 24.13% in the adult population, while NASH is estimated to affect 56% of adults.5,9,10 Based on data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (20022019), NASH was the leading cause of liver transplantation in women and the second most common indication overall in waitlisted transplant candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA.11 Markov modelling suggests that by 2030, approximately 100.9 million people will have NAFLD, and 27.0 million people will have NASH with varying stages of fibrosis.9 The latter represents a 63% increase in NASH cases from 2015. Of those with NASH, 14 million are projected to have fibrosis score of F2 or higher (i.e. moderate-to-high fibrosis), which may represent the eligible population for treatment should a drug be approved for therapy.9 Despite the increasing prevalence of NASH with the increase in obesity,10 no treatment has been approved by the European Medicines Agency or the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Lipotoxicity as a key driver in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

The pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis is extremely complex but is thought to be conceptionally driven by the excess delivery of free fatty acids to the liver, coupled with increased de novo lipogenesis fuelled with excess carbohydrates, particularly fructose.12,13 The two major fates of fatty acids in hepatocytes are mitochondrial β-oxidation and re-esterification to form triglycerides.13 Triglycerides can be exported into the blood as very-low-density lipoproteins or stored in lipid droplets.14 Lipiddroplet triglyceride undergoes regulated lipolysis to release fatty acids back into the hepatocyte free fatty acid pool.14 When the disposal of fatty acids through β-oxidation or the formation of triglyceride is overwhelmed, fatty acids can contribute to the formation of lipotoxic species that lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidant stress and inflammasome activation.14 Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia further fuel lipid accumulation by not only diverting glucose from glycogen synthesis to de novo lipogenesis in the liver but also impacting peripheral lipolytic pathways.13

When the hepatocytes ability to handle this stress is overwhelmed, hepatocyte injury and apoptosis result in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells and the activation of hepatic stellate cells, which are the predominant cellular source of collagen/fibrosis in response to any chronic liver injury.15 The activation of these repair pathways moves diagnosis from simple steatosis (NAFL) to the the more active progressive form of NAFLD, steatohepatitis (NASH).15

In its quiescent state, the hepatic stellate cell is vitamin rich and produces predominantly type IV collagen. With injury, it undergoes phenotypic changes, including increased proliferation and contractility and a shift towards producing type I and III collagens, which are characteristic of the cirrhotic liver.16 Progressive fibrosis is often defined histologically on a scale ranging from F0 to F4, as shown in Table 1.15 As fibrosis is the most important predictor of clinical outcomes,17,18 improvement in fibrosis has become the most important surrogate endpoint in NASH clinical trials while awaiting longerterm follow-up for clinical outcomes.

In the USA, approximately 20% of patients with NAFLD have disease progression to NASH, and up to 20% of patients with NASH may develop cirrhosis within their lifetime (Figure 1).19 While the most common cause of death in patients with NASH is cardiovascular disease,20 the risk of liver-related mortality increases exponentially with fibrosis stage increase,17 and liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of liver-related mortality in patients with NAFLD.18 Patients with advanced fibrosis are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to the disease progressing to liver failure, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.15,17,18 In addition to obesity and T2DM, other conditions associated with NAFLD include dyslipidaemia, polycystic ovary syndrome, metabolic syndrome, obstructive sleep apnoea and endocrine disorders including hypogonadism, hypopituitarism and hypothyroidism.1 This review will focus on the role of thyroid hormone signalling in NASH pathogenesis and the potential role of thyroid hormone receptor (THR)β agonists as a treatment strategy.

Thyroid hormone-mediated regulation of lipid metabolism and mitochondrial activity in the context of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Low serum thyroid hormone levels are associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

The hypothalamus produces thyroid-releasing hormone, which stimulates the production of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from the pituitary gland.21 TSH promotes the secretion of prohormone thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) from the thyroid gland. T3 binds to the THRα (mainly in the heart and bone) and β (mainly in the liver) to regulate gene transcription. Population studies have shown associations between NAFLD and overt hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism and low thyroid hormone in the normal range.22–25 Patients with higher baseline TSH levels and no evidence of liver disease were more likely to develop NAFLD.26 In addition, the prevalence of NAFLD was found to significantly increase as serum TSH level increased, even after adjusting for age, gender and smoking status.23 Moreover, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by Mantovani et al. found hypothyroidism to be significantly associated with the presence and severity of NAFLD.27 Given the association between hypothyroidism and NAFLD, Bruinstroop et al. treated with T4 20 Asian men who have normal thyroid gland function with T2DM, euthyroidism, hepatic steatosis on ultrasound and alanine aminotransferase levels less than three times the upper limit of normalT4; dosing was titrated to achieve TSH levels 0.341.70 mIU/L, as the lowest prevalence of NAFLD was seen in those with TSH<1.7mIU/L.28 Patients were then treated with maintenance dose of thyroxine for 16 weeks. Reduction in hepatic steatosis was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Overall, a 12% decrease in intrahepatic lipid content was observed, with a 23% reduction in those over the age of 50 years. However, in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism or euthyroidism, the beneficial effects of longer treatment with thyroid hormone would need to be weighed against long-term clinical adverse effects, such as atrial tachycardia, arrhythmias and loss of bone density through the effect of THR-α. As THRβ is the predominant isoform in the liver, specific targeting may be a better approach.

The effect of thyroid hormones on autophagy, mitophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis and β-oxidation

Autophagy is a normal physiologic metabolic process wherein a cell consumes its own redundant or damaged organelles to fuel regeneration of newer healthier organelles. T3 induces autophagy in the hepatoma cell line HepG2 in a dose-dependent manner and specifically promotes lipophagy, resulting in the delivery of additional internal free fatty acids to the mitochondria for βoxidation.29 In addition, T3 promotes mitochondrial oxidation due to a combination of mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis.30 Taken together, these results show that thyroid hormones can regulate lipid homeostasis via autophagy and help to explain how thyroid hormones increase oxidative metabolism through effects on mitochondrial turnover and activity.

Intrahepatic hypothyroidism as a driver of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

In a mouse NASH model where mice were fed a Western diet with fructose for 16 weeks, increased steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis were associated with a statistically significant decrease in intrahepatic T4 and T3.31 In addition, in a dietary mouse model of NASH, administration of thyroid hormones decreased hepatic triglyceride content (3.19 ± 0.68 mM/g liver versus 8.04 ± 0.42 mM/g liver) and hydroxyproline (1.44 ± 0.07 mg/g liver versus 2.58 ± 0.30 mg/g liver) compared with mice with untreated NASH.32 Moreover, thyroid hormones restored autophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis to increase β-oxidation of fatty acids and reduced lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis.32

In the liver, deiodinase type 1 (DIO1) converts the prohormone T4 to the bioactive hormone T3. Interestinglyin a model of early NASHDIO1 levels and activity are increased suggesting that there is a compensatory increase to handle excess lipids.31 However, low DIO1 levels and activity have been observed in humans and rodents with advanced NASH,33 and DIO1 knockdown leads to increased intrahepatic lipid content.31

At the cellular level, in both rodent and human healthy livershepatocytes strongly expressed DIO1 and stromal cells weakly expressed DIO3.33 Very little DIOwas detected in other non-parenchymal cells of the liver. During injury, hepatocyte expression of DIO1 decreased, whereas stromal expression of DIO3 increased, particularly in myofibroblasts.33 In patients, this was also reflected by increased serum reverse T3 (rT3). Moreover, the decreases in the free T3 to rT3 and free T4 to rT3 ratios distinguished advanced from mild fibrosis, even in individuals with similar serum levels of TSH and free T4.33 Therefore, it is thought that with chronic liver injury, intrahepatic thyroid hormone signalling may be impaired; this impairment would decrease conversion of T4 by DIO1 to active T3 and increase conversion of T4 by DIO3 to inactive rT3, leading to the accumulation of lipotoxic species, stimulating a cycle of repetitive liver injury.33 Taken together, these findings suggest that intrahepatic hypothyroidism may be a driver of NASH pathogenesis (Figure 2).

Specific role of thyroid hormone receptorβ in hepatic lipid metabolism

Hepatocytes highly express THR-β, which is responsible for regulating metabolic pathways that are impaired in NAFLD and NASH.34 Most hepatic fat is derived from free fatty acids released by adipocytes. In NASH, β-oxidation of hepatic lipids is decreased, resulting in lipotoxicity.35 Animal studies have shown that the activation of THR-β plays an important role in reducing triglycerides and cholesterol.33,36 In cultured HepG2THRβ cells of a mouse modelthyroid hormone treatment increased mitochondrial respiration and fatty acid oxidation under basal and palmitic acid-treated conditions and decreased lipopolysaccharides and palmitic acid-stimulated inflammatory and fibrotic responses.32 Figure 3 summarizes and highlights some of the hepatocyte pathways thought to be upregulated by THR-β agonists and most relevant to NASH.

It is hypothesized that THRβ agonists, such as resmetirom, activate THR-β, an abundant nuclear hormone receptor found hepatocytes. It is hypothesized that activating THR-β modulates several genes that promote uptake of free fatty acids from both external sources (CPT1), as well as increased production and uptake of internal free fatty acids from de novo lipogenesis (ACC1, FAS) and lipophagy. Increased mitochondrial biogenesis (CPT1a, mcad, PDk4, UCP2) and mitophagy of unhealthy mitochondria increase capacity to handle and burn the increased flow of free fatty acids. While increased cholesterol is produced due to upregulation of HMGCoA reductase, bile acid synthesis increases through increased CYP7A1 and excretion, and LDL uptake by the liver increases by induction of the LDL-R. As a result, fatty acid β-oxidation, mitochondrial biogenesis, de novo lipogenesis, cholesterol and bile acid synthesis all increase, and LDL cholesterol levels decreaseSHBG, which transports androgens and oestrogens in blood and regulates their access to target tissues, is also a known downstream target of THR-β and may be a biomarker of target engagement.

In one study, patients with THR-β mutations had increased liver fat (as assessed by controlled attenuation parameters using transient, elastography) compared with their unaffected family members, while controlling for body mass index.37 All participants belonged to the same family, lived on the same small island and were, therefore, exposed to similar environmental conditions. No difference in insulin resistance was observed between the two groups. Individuals with NASH display low THR-β activity, which exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction and lipotoxicity.35 Given the role played by THR-β signalling in liver metabolism, a strong rationale for developing THRβ-selective thyromimetics exists. Consequently, new molecules with a very high THRβ affinity and hepatic selectivity have been developed to treat lipid-associated hepatic disorders, in particular NAFLD.

Thyroid hormone receptorβ agonists for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

For the treatment of NASH, a THR-β agonist ideally needs to achieve three goals: 1) reduced hepatic steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis; 2) liver specificity with no effect on the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis, which regulates serum thyroid levels; 3) high THR-β selectivity to limit off-target THR-α effects on the bone/cartilage and heart.

Sobetirome (GC-1) and eprotirome (KB2115) were the first THR-β agonists shown to reduce intrahepatic lipid content in preclinical models.38,39 Despite its favourable lipid-lowering effects, eprotirome development was halted in phase III because it caused cartilage damage in dogs following chronic treatment.40 In addition, liver toxicity was noted when patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia were treated after only 6 weeks.34,40 Sobetirome had beneficial effects on lipid profile by upregulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors on hepatocytes, and reduced hepatic steatosis in a rat model of NAFLD. Despite these favourable results, funding limited its advancement to phase I, along with some experimental observations of hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance.41 Interestingly, Sob-AM2, a methyl amide derivative of sobetirome, which has greater central nervous system penetration, is being investigated for treating demyelinating diseases in preclinical models.42 Novel 4amino-benzyl-phenoxyacetic acid thyromimetics IS25 and the prodrug TG68 showed promise in preclinical testing, and additional in vivo studies will be needed to determine their potential for treating NAFLD and NASH.34 A novel glucagon/T3 hybrid molecule, which is meant to have both the anti-lipid effects of glucagon along with the positive energy effects of T3, has recently been developed.43 Preclinical models using this molecule in obese mice found decreased serum lipids, decreased adipose mass, reversal of NASH, reduced atherosclerotic plaque accumulation and improved glucose metabolism, awhile avoiding thyrotoxicosis and the hyperglycaemic effects of glucagon.43 Although additional studies are still needed to advance the molecule, it is notable that this approach does not rely on isoform selectivity to produce its beneficial effects.

The THR-β agonists that are furthest along in development for the treatment of NASH are resmetirom (MGL-3196), VK2809 (MB07811), ASC-41 and TERN 501. VK2809 is a prodrug activated by cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) in the liver and is being investigated for the treatment of NASH with F2/F3 fibrosis in a phase IIb clinical trial ( identifier: NCT04173065),44 and TERN-501 is being investigated for the treatment of NASH in a phase IIa ( identifier: NCT05415722).45 ASC-4, also a prodrug metabolized by CYP3A, is being investigated in a phase II trial and is limited to China ( identifier: NCT05118360).46 Completed and ongoing trials with other THR-β agonists are summarized in Table 2.47–51 Data shown for all agents, with the exception of resmetirom, are derived from presentations at international meetings or results presented on company websites and, thus, have not been subject to peer review.

Summary of p 

Resmetirom is an investigational liver-directed agonist of THR that is 28 times more selective for THR-β over THR-α.52 In vitro studies have demonstrated resmetirom’s preferential use of the organic anion transporting polypeptides 1B1 receptor for hepatocyte uptake and stronger activation of THRβ.53,54 Moreover, oxygen consumption rate studies found that both T3 and resmetirom increased basal and maximal respiration, accompanied by an increase in the production of adenosine triphosphate, reflecting higher oxidation of substrates.53 While it is known that increased hepatic THR-β agonism increases the level of hepatic DIO1,55,56 additional in vitro and in vivo data suggest that resmetirom upregulates the expression of DIO1, supporting its role not only as a thyromimetic but also in potentially increasing the conversion of T4 to T3.54 Although not definitive, the low serum T4 detected in patients treated with resmetirom indirectly suggests this mechanism may be relevant.53

Given its specificity for THRβ and its impact on lipophagy, mitophagy, mitogenesis and βoxidation within hepatocytes, resmetirom is an appealing agent for treating NASH.

The firstin-human data on resmetirom in healthy volunteers came from a single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascendingdose study in 72 subjects to assess its safety and pharmacokinetics ( identifier: NCT01367873) and a 2-week multipledose study (5200 mg) in 48 healthy participants with mildly elevated LDL (>110 mg/dL) to assess its safety, pharmacokinetics, impact on thyroid axis hormones and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effects ( identifier: NCT01519531).57 Resmetirom was tolerated well at all doses, and no dose-related adverse events or changes in electrocardiogram findings, vital signs or liver enzyme levels were reported. Compared with placebo, patients receiving resmetirom displayed a reduction of up to 30% in LDL-C, 28% in non-high-density lipoproteincholesterol24% for in apolipoprotein B and 60% in triglycerides compared with those receiving placebo. At the highest dose (200 mg), there was a significant (p<0.0001) reversible reduction of approximately 20% in the level of prohormone free T4 compared with placebo;57 this could theoretically be explained by increased hepatic metabolism of T4 by DIO1, but has not yet been proven.55 No impact ,on the central thyroid axis was observed, as reflected by the lack of change in TSH or free T3 levels. In conclusion, in this 2-week study, resmetirom was well tolerated and demonstrated favourable effects on lipid metabolism in healthy volunteers with mild elevation in LDL-C.57 Given that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with NASH, the favourable cardiometabolic profile of resmetirom and the preclinical data for intrahepatic thyroidism as a driver of lipotoxicity in NASHresmetirom was advanced to phase II/III trials in patients with NASH.

The first seminal clinical trial was a 36week, phase II, serial liver biopsy study ( identifier: NCT02912260) in patients with biopsyconfirmed NASH (fibrosis stages 13), with a NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥4 and hepatic fat fraction of 10% at baseline when assessed by MRI-PDFF.47 The NAS comprises three components: steatosis (03), ballooning (02) and inflammation (03)The maximum NAS is 8, and patients had to have a score 4 with the requirement of ballooning for inclusion.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either resmetirom 80 mg or placebo orally once a day. Serial hepatic fat measurements were obtained at Weeks 12 and 36, and a second liver biopsy was obtained at Week 36 (Figure 4the 36week main study).47 The primary goal of this study was to determine whether resmetirom could effectively reduce the burden of lipotoxic lipids that may be driving liver injury. Therefore, the primary endpoint was relative change in MRI-PDFF fat quantification at 12 weeks in patients on resmetirom compared with placebo. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who had achieved a reduction in hepatic fat of ≥30% at 12 and 36 weeks on MRI-PDFF, and critical liver biopsy assessments evaluating significant improvements in NASH and fibrosis as dictated by the FDA. Reduction in ballooning and inflammation are critical, as a simple reduction in steatosis in isolation could result in a 2point reduction in NAS without any impact on the more relevant features of ballooning and inflammation.

At Week 12 of treatment, patients treated with resmetirom (n=78) demonstrated both a relative reduction (-32.9% versus 10.4%) and an absolute reduction (-7.0% versus 2.7%) of hepatic fat compared with patients on placebo (n=38p<0.0001). At Week 36, patients treated with resmetirom (n=74) showed both a statistically significant relative (37.3% versus 8.9%) and absolute (-8.2% versus 2.8%) reduction in hepatic fat compared with patients on placebo (n=34; p<0.0001) (Table 3).47 Furthermore, resmetirom seemed to produce statistically significant reductions in a number of secondary and exploratory endpoints, including liver enzymes, multiple lipoproteins and atherogenic lipids (Table 4).47 rT3 levels were also significantly reduced in resmetirom-treated patients, suggesting an impact on intrahepatic metabolism of T4 towards active T3, possibly due to increased DIO1 activity. Resmetirom exposure was assessed by Week 2 through pharmacokinetic studies, and dose adjustments were made at Week 4 by an unblinded monitor. Asex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) is a known downstream target of THRβ agonism in the liver, it was assessed as a potential surrogate marker of target engagement and hepatic exposure to resmetirom, with a high SHBG group defined as 75% and 88% increase in SHBG concentration from baseline to Week 12 and 36, respectively. Therefore, secondary and exploratory endpoints were broken down by exposure level and SHBG response.

Although there was not a significant difference in the number of patients achieving 1 stage improvement in fibrosis on resmetirom compared with placebo at the Week 36 liver biopsy, several key observations were made in assessing the impact of resmetirom on NASH and predictors of response. Specifically, the proportion of patients with a 2-point reduction in NAS and at least a 1-point reduction in either ballooning or inflammation at the Week 36 biopsy was significantly greater in the resmetirom group compared with the placebo group but only in certain subgroups of patients, including those who had <5% weight loss (p=0.017), those with high resmetirom exposure (p=0.021) and those who were MRIPDFF responders by Week 12 (p=0063). This last finding suggests that early reduction in hepatic fat could predict who is likely to have a response by the Week 36 liver biopsy. Indeed, of the 46 patients in the resmetirom group who were MRI-PDFF responders at Week 12, 18 (39%) achieved NASH resolution (p=0.0013), defined as a ballooning score of 0, inflammation of 01 with a 2 point reduction in NAS score. Change in absolute NAS was not significantly different between groups but did show a difference in those with high exposure, high SHBG and Week 12 MRI-PDFF response (Table 5).47 The authors suggested that thyroid hormoneresponsive protein SHBG may serve as a biomarker for monitoring compliance and optimizing dosing. There was no difference in patients who achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, except in subgroup analysis of those with <9.5% weight loss and MRI-PDFF response, defined as >30% reduction of MRI-PDFF at Week 12.

Overall, this study met its primary endpoint of MRI-PDFF reduction at Week 12. Moreover, resmetirom responders with 30% MRI-PDFF reduction at Week 12 had higher rates of NASH resolution (37%) at the Week 36 liver biopsy compared with non-responders (4%) along with reduction in liver enzymes and fibrosis biomarkers, suggesting that early MRI-PDFF response may predict future NASH resolution and anti-fibrotic effect. In patients treated with resmetirom, a higher incidence of mild diarrhoea and nausea was reported; however, most adverse events were mild, self-limiting and balanced between the two groups studied. There were no reports of adverse events related to THR-α activity, such as changes in bone mineral density based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, thyroid axis suppression or cardiovascular adverse events.47

At the end of the main 36week, phase II study, a 36week, activetreatment, open-label extension (OLE) study was conducted in 31 patients with persistently mild to markedly elevated liver enzymes (Figure 4).58 All OLE study endpoints were exploratory. The main efficacy outcome was absolute and relative reductions in MRI-PDFF at Week 36. At Week 36, patients treated with resmetirom 80 mg or 100 mg demonstrated a mean absolute reduction in MRI-PDFF of 11.1% (standard error 1.5%p<0.0001) and mean relative reduction of 52.3% (standard error 4.4%, p<0.0001). Interestingly, the controlled attenuation parameter score, which is commonly used to assess steatosis with FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris, France), did not correlate with changes in MRI-PDFF, suggesting that it may not be a reliable assessment of steatosis reduction in response to treatment. Other key outcomes, including liver enzymes, lipid profiles and markers of fibrogenesis, were favourably reduced and are shown in Table 6.58 While no repeat liver biopsy was conducted at the end of the OLE study, several markers of fibrogenesis were assessed. Of particular interest were PRO-C3 and C3M levels, which had not been initially analysed in the main 36week study. PRO-C3 reflects the production of the pro-peptide (N-terminal pro-collagen) of type III collagen and is thought to be a biomarker of new collagen production by activated stellate cells or fibrogenesis. On the other hand, C3M is the matrix metallopeptidase 9mediated degradation product of type III collagen and, thus, reflects fibrinolysis. Therefore, the PRO-C3/C3M ratio is thought to reflect net fibrosis production.59 In the post hoc analysis from the main study, the PRO-C3/C3M ratio significantly correlated with fibrosis stage (p=0.001) and ballooning (p=0.003) on liver biopsy. It did not correlate with other NAS components.58 During the OLE study, similar to the main study, PRO-C3, a neo-epitope pro-peptide of type III collagen formation, was reduced significantly with resmetirom treatment (p=0.0005), and C3M increased such that the PRO-C3/C3M ratio decreased significantly with treatment (p<0.0001).58 Consistent with these changes, liver stiffness calculated using vibrationcontrolled transient elastography on FibroScan® showed statistically significant (p=0.015) improvement during the 36week OLE study and may serve as a convenient pointofcare assessment for treatment effects in a real-world setting.60 In terms of impact on the thyroid axis, treatment with resmetirom significantly reduced serum rT3 and increased the free T3/rT3 ratio. The extent to which this reflects a correction in hepatic thyroid activity is not clear, but is postulated. While no effect on TSH was observed, free T3 did increase by 4%, which requires further monitoring in longerterm follow-up. Overall, results from the 36week phase II study and the 36week OLE study demonstrated safety and efficacy, informed dosing, and suggested the potential role of noninvasive assessments in evaluating response to resmetirom, further influencing use in the phase III NASH study MAESTRO-NASH ( identifier: NCT03900429).47,58,61 Interestingly, using data from the main study, those with a ≥30% reduction in fat on MRI-PDFF by Week 12 were independently associated with greater improvements in physical functioning and Physical Component Summary scores at Week 36 (p<o.05).62 Patients with improvement in NASH and fibrosis on liver biopsy also showed improvement in components of health-related quality of life.47 Whether this improvement is seen in longer-term studies remains to be evaluated, but these results are encouraging as the regulatory agencies want to ensure that any therapy makes a patient function and feel better.


Positive phase III results for non-thyroid hormone receptorβ agonists in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitisobeticholic acid

While the focus of this review is on resmetirom, obeticholic acid (OCA) has also demonstrated positive phase III results for NASH. OCA is a bile acid analogue that works by activating the farnesoid X receptor and received FDA approval for the treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis in 2016.63 In a large, multicentre, phase IIb clinical trial, patients who received OCA (25 mg/day) demonstrated improved steatohepatitis and fibrosis over 72 weeks.64 In the phase III clinical trial, OCA significantly improved fibrosis and NASH disease activity among patients with NASH.65 Due to its mechanism of action, OCA inhibits the synthesis of bile acids from cholesterol and thus results in a mild increase in cholesterol and the incidence of gallstones in patients on therapy. Pruritis is a common side effect that can cause therapy discontinuations in about 10% of patients. An ongoing phase III study is assessing the long-term efficacy and safety of OCA ( identifier: NCT02548351) and is under review by the FDA.66 It is possible that OCA will be the first approved therapy for NASH, with submission of resmetirom data to the FDA to follow.

Future directions and anticipated focus of new clinical trials

Based on its safety, tolerability and efficacy as reflected by noninvasive assessments, resmetirom has established itself as a leader in the crowded field of potential NASH therapeutics. While not yet published and thus not discussed extensively, 52week serial biopsy data including 950 patients from the MAESTRO-NASH trial were released publicly in topline clinical results at the end of 2022.67 Both primary outcomes were met with 1) NASH resolution (ballooning of 0, inflammation of 01) and 2-point NAS reduction, with no worsening of fibrosis (p<0.0001 at both doses), and 2) fibrosis improvement by at least one stage, with no worsening of NAS (p=0.0002 and p<0.0001 at 80 mg and 100 mg, respectively). We await a formal peer-reviewed publication and Subpart H (Accelerated Approval of New Drugs for Serious or Life-Threatening Illnessesfiling with the FDA. While the MAESTRO-NAFLD-OLE study focuses on the safety and tolerability of an additional 52 weeks of resmetirom exposure, the extensive secondary and exploratory endpoints provided invaluable information on the monitoring of drug response using various noninvasive assessments of steatosis and more importantly fibrosis.58

Thus far, no clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of resmetirom in a cirrhotic population, largely because they have focused on reducing fibrosis by one stage on liver biopsy as a primary endpoint, or have enrolled patients with too advanced disease. For a cirrhosis trial, clinical endpoints represent the most critical assessment of efficacy. The MAESTRO-NASH-OUTCOMES trial ( identifier NCT05500222) will be enrolling patients with early Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis (score of 56) and, through a rigorous adjudication process, define clinical events with a composite clinical endpoint that includes hepatic decompensation events, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score 15, liver transplant and all-cause mortality.68 Ultimately, it is improvement in clinical outcomes that will move both the FDA and payors.

The path to NASH therapeutics reaching the market has been challenging. Early optimism was tempered by numerous failed trials. However, optimism has been renewed with the promising data collected for resmetirom. Its safety profile, coupled with potential efficacy that will be determined in upcoming data from phase III trials, positions it as a leader in a crowded field of candidate therapeutics.

Article Information:

Meena B Bansal currently receives research funding from Pfizer, The Kinetix Group, and the World Trade Center Health Program, and has served as a consultant for Myovant, The Kinetix Group, Pfizer, Theratechnologies, Madrigal, Fibronostics and NovoNordisk. She is the site principal investigator for more than 6 NASH clinical trials including for Intercept and Madrigal. She serves on the Madrigal Steering Committee and serves a consultant. She has received less than $10,000 from Madrigal (Resmetirom) in cumulative compensation over the past 3 years. Gres Karim has no financial or non- financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This study involves a review of the literature and did not involve any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

Double- blind peer review.


The named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.


Meena B Bansal, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, Box 1123, New York, NY 10029, USA. E: meena. bansal@ mssm. edu


The publication of this article was supported by the Wreschnser Liver Research Fund, the NASH Center of Excellence and the Department of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine.


This article is freely accessible at © Touch Medical Media 2023

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the writing of this article.




1. Chalasani NYounossi ZLavine JEet alThe diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American association for the study of liver diseasesHepatology2018;67:32857DOI10.1002/hep.29367

2. Diehl AMDay CCause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitisN Engl J Med2017;377:206372. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1503519

3. Ekstedt MFranzén LEMathiesen ULet alLong-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymesHepatology2006;44:86573DOI10.1002/hep.21327

4. Younossi ZMStepanova MRafiq Net alPathologic criteria for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Interprotocol agreement and ability to predict liver-related mortalityHepatology2011;53:187482DOI10.1002/hep.24268

5. Younossi ZMKoenig ABAbdelatif Det alGlobal epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomesHepatology2016;64:7384DOI10.1002/hep.28431

6. Younossi ZMGolabi Pde Avila Let alThe global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysisJ Hepatol Oct2019;71:793801DOI10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021

7. Polyzos SAKountouras JMantzoros CSObesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism2019;92:8297DOI10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.014

8. Quek JChan KEWong ZYet alGlobal prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the overweight and obese population: A systematic review and meta-analysisLancet Gastroenterol Hepatol2023;8:2030DOI10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00317-X

9. Estes CRazavi HLoomba Ret alModeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of diseaseHepatology2018;67:12333DOI10.1002/hep.29466

10. Younossi ZAnstee QMMarietti Met alGlobal burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and preventionNat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol2018;15:1120DOI10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109

11. Younossi ZMStepanova MOng Jet alNonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation in the united statesClin Gastroenterol Hepatol Mar2021;19:5809DOI10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.064

12. Chakravarthy MVNeuschwander-Tetri BAThe metabolic basis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitisEndocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;3:e00112. DOI10.1002/edm2.112

13. Loomba RFriedman SLShulman GIMechanisms and disease consequences of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseCell2021;184:253764. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.015

14. Friedman SLNeuschwander-Tetri BARinella MSanyal AJMechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategiesNat Med. 2018;24:90822. DOI10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9

15. Angulo PMachado MVDiehl AMFibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Mechanisms and clinical implicationsSemin Liver Dis. 2015;35:13245DOI10.1055/s-0035-1550065

16. Bansal MBChamroonkul NAntifibrotics in liver disease: Are we getting closer to clinical use? Hepatol Int2019;13:2539. DOI10.1007/s12072-018-9897-3

17. Dulai PSSingh SPatel Jet alIncreased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysisHepatology2017;65:155765DOI10.1002/hep.29085

18. Angulo PKleiner DEDam-Larsen Set alLiver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseGastroenterology2015;149:38997DOI10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043

19. Sheka ACAdeyi OThompson Jet alNonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A reviewJAMA2020;323:117583DOI10.1001/jama.2020.2298

20. Younossi ZHenry LContribution of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to the burden of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Gastroenterology2016;150:177885DOI10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.005

21. Mullur RLiu Y-YBrent GAThyroid hormone regulation of metabolismPhysiol Rev2014;94:35582DOI10.1152/physrev.00030.2013

22. Liangpunsakul SChalasani NIs hypothyroidism a risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis? J Clin Gastroenterol2003;37:3403. DOI10.1097/00004836-200310000-00014

23. Xu CXu LYu Cet alAssociation between thyroid function and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in euthyroid elderly ChineseClin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;75:2406DOI10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04016.x

24. Ludwig UHolzner DDenzer Cet alSubclinical and clinical hypothyroidism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study of a random population sample aged 18 to 65 yearsBMC Endocr Disord2015;15:41DOI10.1186/s12902-015-0030-5

25. Bano AChaker LPlompen EPCet alThyroid function and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The Rotterdam studyJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2016;101:320411DOI10.1210/jc.2016-1300

26. Xu LMa HMiao MLi YImpact of subclinical hypothyroidism on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective case-control studyJ Hepatol Nov2012;57:11534DOI10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.025

27. Mantovani ANascimbeni FLonardo Aet alAssociation between primary hypothyroidism and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysisThyroid2018;28:127084DOI10.1089/thy.2018.0257

28. Bruinstroop EDalan RCao Yet alLow-dose levothyroxine reduces intrahepatic lipid content in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLDJ Clin Endocrinol Metab2018;103:2698706DOI10.1210/jc.2018-00475

29. Sinha RAYou S-HZhou Jet alThyroid hormone stimulates hepatic lipid catabolism via activation of autophagyJ Clin Invest2012;122:242838DOI10.1172/JCI60580

30. Sinha RASingh BKZhou Jet alThyroid hormone induction of mitochondrial activity is coupled to mitophagy via ROS-AMPK-ULK1 signaling. Autophagy2015;11:134157DOI10.1080/15548627.2015.1061849

31. Bruinstroop EZhou JTripathi Met alEarly induction of hepatic deiodinase type 1 inhibits hepatosteatosis during NAFLD progressionMol Metab. 2021;53:101266DOI10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101266

32. Zhou JTripathi MHo JPet alThyroid hormone decreases hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in a dietary mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitisThyroid2022;32:72538DOI10.1089/thy.2021.0621

33. Bohinc BNMichelotti GXie Get alRepair-related activation of Hedgehog signaling in stromal cells promotes intrahepatic hypothyroidism. Endocrinology. 2014;155:4591601DOI10.1210/en.2014-1302

34. Saponaro FSestito SRunfola Met alSelective thyroid hormone receptor-beta (TRβ) agonists: New perspectives for the treatment of metabolic and neurodegenerative disordersFront Med (Lausanne)2020;7:331DOI10.3389/fmed.2020.00331

35. Sinha RASingh BKYen PMDirect effects of thyroid hormones on hepatic lipid metabolismNat Rev Endocrinol2018;14:25969. DOI10.1038/nrendo.2018.10

36. Sinha RABruinstroop ESingh BKYen PMNonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hypercholesterolemia: Roles of thyroid hormones, metabolites, and agonists. Thyroid2019;29:117391DOI10.1089/thy.2018.0664

37. Chaves CBruinstroop ERefetoff Set alIncreased hepatic fat content in patients with resistance to thyroid hormone beta. Thyroid2021;31:112734DOI10.1089/thy.2020.0651

38. Perra ASimbula GSimbula Met alThyroid hormone (T3) and TRbeta agonist GC-1 inhibit/reverse nonalcoholic fatty liver in ratsFASEB J2008;22:29819DOI10.1096/fj.08-108464

39. Cable EEFinn PDStebbins JWet alReduction of hepatic steatosis in rats and mice after treatment with a liver-targeted thyroid hormone receptor agonistHepatology2009;49:40717DOI10.1002/hep.22572

40. Sjouke BLangslet GCeska Ret alEprotirome in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (the AKKA trial): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studyLancet Diabetes Endocrinol2014;2:45563DOI10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70006-3

41. Vatner DFWeismann DBeddow SAet alThyroid hormone receptor-β agonists prevent hepatic steatosis in fat-fed rats but impair insulin sensitivity via discrete pathwaysAm J Physiol Endocrinol Metab2013;305:E89100DOI10.1152/ajpendo.00573.2012

42. Chaudhary PMarracci GHCalkins Eet alThyroid hormone and thyromimetics inhibit myelin and axonal degeneration and oligodendrocyte loss in EAEJ Neuroimmunol2021;352:577468DOI10.1016/j.jneuroim.2020.577468

43. Finan BClemmensen CZhu Zet alChemical hybridization of glucagon and thyroid hormone optimizes therapeutic impact for metabolic disease. Cell2016;167:84357DOI10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.014

44.ClinicalTrials.govA study to assess the efficacy and safety of VK2809 for 52 weeks in subjects with biopsy proven NASH (VOYAGE). Identifier: NCT04173065Available at (accessed date16 March 2023) study: A clinical study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered TERN-501 as monotherapy and in combination with TERN-101 in noncirrhotic adults with presumed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Identifier: NCT05415722. : . Available at (accessed date16 March 2023)

46.ClinicalTrials.govStudy to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ASC41 in adults with NASH. Identifier: NCT05118360. Available at (Date last accessedMarch 2023)

47. Harrison SABashir MRGuy CDet alResmetirom (MGL-3196) for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trialLancet2019;394:201224DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32517-6

48. The Digital International Liver Congress. Abstract bookAvailable at

49. European Association for the Study of the Liver. The International liver Congress. Abstract book2022Available at (Date last accessed18 April 2023)

50. AscetisGannex announces positive phase I clinical results on its THR-β agonist ASC412021Available at:

51. AscetisGannex announces positive clinical results in overweight and obese subjects for its THR-β agonist ASC412021Available at: (Date last accessed11 April 2023)

52. Kelly MJPietranico-Cole SLarigan JDet alDiscovery of 2-[3,5-dichloro-4- (5-isopropyl-6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridazin-3-yloxy) phenyl] -3,5-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro [1,2,4] triazine-6-carbonitrile (MGL-3196), a highly selective thyroid hormone receptor β agonist in clinical trials for the treatment of dyslipidemiaJ Med Chem2014;57:391223DOI10.1021/jm4019299

53. Hönes GSSivakumar RGHoppe Cet alCell-Specific transport and thyroid hormone receptor isoform selectivity account for hepatocyte-targeted thyromimetic action of MGL-3196Int J Mol Sci2022;23:22DOI10.3390/ijms232213714

54. Luong XGStevens SKJekle Aet alRegulation of gene transcription by thyroid hormone receptor β agonists in clinical development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)PLoS One2020;15:e0240338DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0240338

55. Kelly GSPeripheral metabolism of thyroid hormones: A reviewAltern Med Rev2000;5:30633.

56. Bianco ACKim BWDeiodinases: Implications of the local control of thyroid hormone actionJ Clin Invest2006;116:25719DOI10.1172/JCI29812

57. Taub RChiang EChabot-Blanchet Met alLipid lowering in healthy volunteers treated with multiple doses of MGL-3196, a liver-targeted thyroid hormone receptor-β agonistAtherosclerosis2013;230:37380DOI10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.056

58. Harrison SABashir MMoussa SEet alEffects of resmetirom on noninvasive endpoints in a 36-week phase 2 active treatment extension study in patients with NASHHepatol Commun2021;5:57388DOI10.1002/hep4.1657

59. Boyle MTiniakos DSchattenberg JMet alPerformance of the PRO-C3 collagen neo-epitope biomarker in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JHEP Rep2019;1:18898DOI10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.06.004

60. Eddowes PJSasso MAllison Met alAccuracy of fibroscan controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseGastroenterology2019;156:171730DOI10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042

61.ClinicalTrials.govA phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MGL-3196 (resmetirom) in patients with NASH and fibrosis (MAESTRO-NASH). Identifier: NCT03900429Available at (accessed date16 March 2023)

62. Younossi ZMStepanova MTaub RAet alHepatic fat reduction due to resmetirom in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with improvement of quality of lifeClin Gastroenterol Hepatol2022;20:135461DOI10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.039

63. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves ocaliva for rare, chronic liver disease2016Available at (Date last accessed11 April 2023)

64. Neuschwander-Tetri BALoomba RSanyal AJet alFarnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trialLancet2015;385:95665DOI10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61933-4

65. Younossi ZMRatziu VLoomba Ret alObeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trialLancet2019;394:218496DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33041-7 . Randomized global phase 3 study to evaluate the impact on NASH with fibrosis of obeticholic acid treatment (REGENERATE). Identifier: NCT02548351Available at (accessed date16 March 2023)

67. MadrigalMadrigal announces positive topline results from the pivotal phase 3 MAESTRO-NASH clinical trial of resmetirom for the treatment of NASH and liver fibrosis2022Available at (Date last accessed11 April 2023)

68.ClinicalTrials.govA phase 3 study to evaluate the effect of resmetirom on clinical OUTCOMES in patients with well-compensated NASH cirrhosis (MAESTRO-NASH-OUTCOMES). identifier: NCT05500222Available at: (accessed date16 March 2023)

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Liver Disorders
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-down-editablearrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greenarrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-red tick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Sponsored Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28