touchENDOCRINOLOGY touchENDOCRINOLOGY
Cardiovascular Risk
Read Time: 2 mins

Statin Drug Interactions in Patients with Comorbidities and on Multiple Medications

Copy Link
Published Online: Sep 14th 2012 US Endocrinology, 2012;8(2):104-111 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2012.08.02.104
Authors: Matthew K Ito
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

Extensive clinical evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of statin treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, nearly half of patients taking statins discontinue their use, largely as a result of side effects. Many patients receiving statins are elderly, and/or have comorbid conditions, increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Statin DDIs are largely the result of altered drug metabolism via cytochrome P450s (CYPs), glucuronidation or altered drug transport via organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). There is a need for discussion and education about DDIs within the clinical consultation. Statins that are not significantly metabolized via the CYP system have a reduced risk of DDIs. To date, pitavastatin has shown a low rate of DDIs compared to other available statins metabolized by CYP3A4 isozymes. Its potential for CYP-mediated DDIs has been studied in combination with a wide range of drug classes known to be CYP inhibitors and has been clinically evaluated in patients populations where multiple medications are used, including the elderly, those high risk of CVD, and those taking protease inhibitors. It may also have beneficial effects on parameters of glucose metabolism, and has shown improved outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Knowledge of statin pharmacokinetics, their dose limitations and contraindications, and their mechanisms of DDI allows improved therapeutic choices, avoiding adverse interactions without compromising patient care.

Keywords

Cytochrome P450, drug-drug interaction, p-glycoprotein, organic anion-transporting polypeptide, pitavastatin, statin

Article:

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and an overwhelming body of clinical evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of statin treatment in the prevention of this condition. Therapeutic goals in the prevention of CVD include management of dyslipidemia and of its complications such as hypertension and diabetes. Statins are the most widely used treatment in the management of dyslipidemia and exert their therapeutic action by competitively inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and an overwhelming body of clinical evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of statin treatment in the prevention of this condition. Therapeutic goals in the prevention of CVD include management of dyslipidemia and of its complications such as hypertension and diabetes. Statins are the most widely used treatment in the management of dyslipidemia and exert their therapeutic action by competitively inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. Inhibition of this enzyme results in upregulation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and a reduction in the plasma levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), non high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B.1 Results from a meta-analysis showed that statins reduce the five-year incidence of major coronary events, coronary revascularization, and stroke by about a fifth for each mmol/l reduction in LDL-C.2

Despite the known efficacy of statins, high LDL-C remains underdiagnosed and undertreated: it is estimated that 71 million US adults (≥20 years of age) have LDL-C levels greater than the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP-III) goals.3 In the National Cholesterol Education Program evaluation project utilizing novel E-technology (NEPTUNE) II survey, it was found that patients with diabetes (55 %) and other coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalents (40 %) were less likely to have achieved their LDL-C targets than those with CHD (62 %).4 Therefore, the use of these drugs at conventional doses may be unsatisfactory for LDL-C management in patients with diabetes, other CHD risk equivalents, and CHD. For such patients, administration of statins at high doses, or concomitant use of other agents for dyslipidemia may be considered.However, such options may increase the risk of serious adverse drug reactions.5

Adverse drug reactions are a significant burden in healthcare and are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.6 Although the rate of adverse affects during statin monotherapy is generally low, in rare cases (0.1–0.2 %), statins may cause myositis,7 and in extremely rare cases, life-threatening rhabdomyolysis.7,8 Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) that increase the serum concentration of statins can increase the risk of these muscle-related adverse events.9 The aim of this article is to discuss the patient populations who are most at risk of statin DDIs, and outline dyslipidemia treatment choices that may reduce the risk of DDIs in these patients.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

Article Information:
Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

The publication of this article was funded by Kowa Pharmaceuticals. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Kowa Pharmaceuticals.

Support

The publication of this article was funded by Kowa Pharmaceuticals. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Kowa Pharmaceuticals.

Received

2012-11-20T00:00:00

References

  1. Corsini A, Bellosta S, Baetta R, et al., New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins, Pharmacol Ther, 1999;84:413–28.
  2. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al., Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials, Lancet, 2010;376:1670–81.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of high levels of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol--United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 60:109–14.
  4. Davidson MH, Maki KC, Pearson TA, et al., Results of the National Cholesterol Education (NCEP) Program Evaluation ProjecT Utilizing Novel E-Technology (NEPTUNE) II survey and implications for treatment under the recent NCEP Writing Group recommendations, Am J Cardiol, 2005;96:556–63.
  5. Ito MK, Dyslipidemia: management using optimal lipidlowering therapy, Ann Pharmacother, 2012;46:1368–81.
  6. Hakkarainen KM, Hedna K, Petzold M, et al., Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactions--a meta-analysis, PLoS One, 2012;7:e33236.
  7. Thompson PD, Clarkson P, Karas RH, Statin-associated myopathy, JAMA, 2003;289:1681–90.
  8. Staffa JA, Chang J, Green L, Cerivastatin and reports of fatal rhabdomyolysis, N Engl J Med, 2002;346:539–40.
  9. Corsini A, Ceska R, Drug-drug interactions with statins: will pitavastatin overcome the statins' Achilles' heel?, Curr Med Res Opin, 2011;27:1551–62.
  10. Kawai Y, Sato-Ishida R, Motoyama A, et al., Place of pitavastatin in the statin armamentarium: promising evidence for a role in diabetes mellitus, Drug Des Devel Ther, 2011;5:283–97.
  11. Weber W (eds.), Pharmacogenetics, 2008, New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Guengerich FP, Cytochrome P-450 3A4: regulation and role in drug metabolism, Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 1999;39:1–17.
  13. Neuvonen PJ, Niemi M, Backman JT, Drug interactions with lipid-lowering drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2006;80:565–81.
  14. Neuvonen PJ, Jalava KM, Itraconazole drastically increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1996;60:54–61.
  15. Neuvonen PJ, Kantola T, Kivisto KT, Simvastatin but not pravastatin is very susceptible to interaction with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1998;63:332–41.

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Cardiovascular Risk
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-down-editablearrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greenarrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-red tick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Sponsored Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-29TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-30TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-31TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-32TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-33TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-34TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-35TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-36TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-37TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-38TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-39TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-40TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-41TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-42TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-43TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-44TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-45TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-46TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-47TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-48TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-49TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-50TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-51TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-52TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-53TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-54TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-55TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-56TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-57TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-58TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-59TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-60TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-61TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-62TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-63TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-64TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-65TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-66TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-67TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-68TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-69TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-70TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-71TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-72