In 1977, the select committee on nutrition and human needs of the US Senate recommended increasing carbohydrates intake to 55–60 % of the total caloric intake, while reducing fat consumption from approximately 40–30 % of the total daily calories.1 The aims of these recommendations were to reduce health care costs and to maximize the quality of life of Americans as stated by George McGovern, the chairman of that committee. The proposed cost saving was related to the possible reduction in the in incidence of heart disease, cancer, and stroke, among other killer diseases. Despite being controversial recommendations, which were based on weak scientific evidence, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) created a food pyramid and placed carbohydrates at its base.2 The nation embarked on a vast nutritional experiment as stated by Philip Handler, the President of the National Academy of Science at that time. It was not a surprise that since then the prevalence of obesity went up significantly3–5 and, in contrary to the main aim of the recommendations, the prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease also went up. Physiologically, this was explained by the increased insulin response to carbohydrates, which through its lipogenic effect increases storage of fat. It was later shown that accumulation of fat in the visceral area is associated with chronic subclinical inflammation that is directly related to insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis.6 Before these recommendations and from the turn of the twentieth century, diabetes was predominantly defined as a carbohydrate intolerance disease and was mainly treated by reducing carbohydrates intake. Thus, it was absurd that the American Diabetes Association (ADA) also agreed, at that time, to recommend increasing carbohydrates intake for patients with diabetes. Carbohydrates restriction was particularly successful before the discovery of insulin, where Elliot P. Joslin successfully treated his patients diagnosed with fatty diabetes (later known as type 2 diabetes) with a diet that contained only 2 % carbohydrates and 75 % fat.7 His eccentric diet was reincarnated later as the Atkins diet. Such extreme reduction of carbohydrates, despite being successful in treating type 2 diabetes, was shown to be associated with side effects like constipation, headache, bad breath, and muscle cramps.8 Although the amount of carbohydrates intake was significantly relaxed after the insulin discovery, it never exceeded 40 % of daily caloric intake—an amount that was shown to reduce the glucose and triglycerides area under the curve by around 40 %.9 Since 2003, many clinical trials confirmed that reducing carbohydrates was superior to reducing fat in decreasing body weight and in improving glycemic control.10–12 It was later shown that reducing carbohydrates for patients with diabetes improves insulin sensitivity, reduces visceral fat and triglycerides, and increases HDL-cholesterol.13 More recently, a metaanalysis showed that reducing carbohydrates load and glycemic index was associated with a reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes. After weight reduction, maintaining a diet lower in glycemic index and higher in protein was shown to maintain weight loss for a longer duration.14 Now, it is obvious that increasing carbohydrates in the diet increases glucose toxicity and consequently increases insulin resistance, triglycerides level, and reduces HDL-cholesterol. Recently, the ADA departed from the recommendation of high carbohydrates intake and recommended individualization of the nutrition needs. It is clear that we made a major mistake in recommending the increase of carbohydrates load to >40 % of the total caloric intake. This era should come to an end if we seriously want to reduce the obesity and diabetes epidemics. Such a move may also improve diabetes control and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, many physicians and dietitians across the nation are still recommending high carbohydrates intake for patients with diabetes, a recommendation that may harm their patients more than benefit them.
Increased dietary carbohydrates contributed to the escalating prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes. From the late seventies, several medical societies recommended reducing fat intake and replaced it with carbohydrates. These mistaken recommendations contributed to poor diabetes control, abnormal lipid profile and increasing insulin resistance without reduction in cardiovascular mortality. Over the last few years, strong evidence suggest reducing carbohydrates intake for patients with type 2 diabetes to less than 40%. The era of high carbohydrates came to an end.
low carbohydrates, obesity, type 2 diabetes
Osama Hamdy, MD, PhD is receiving research support from Neurometrix and Metagenics and is consultant to Abbott Nutrition. No funding was received for the
publication of this article
Osama Hamdy, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, USA. E: Osama.firstname.lastname@example.org
2. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232, 1980. Available at: http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=CAT8721365 0&content=PDF. Last accessed December 1st, 2014.
3. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, and Johnson CL, Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960- 1994, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1998;22(1):39–47.
4. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, et al., Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002, JAMA, 2004;291(23):2847–50.
5. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, and Ogden CL, Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010, JAMA, 2012;307(5):491–7.
6. Aldhahi W and Hamdy O, Adipokines, inflammation, and the endothelium in diabetes, Curr Diab Rep, 2003;3(4):293–8.
7. Westman EC, Yancy WS, Humphreys M. Dietary Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus in the Pre-Insulin Era (1914-1922). Perspect Biol Med. 2006;49(1):77-83.
8. Yancy WS Jr, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, et al., A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia: a randomized, controlled trial, Ann Intern Med, 2004;140(10):769–77.
9. Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ, Saeed A, et al., An increase in dietary protein improves the blood glucose response in persons with type 2 diabetes, Am J Clin Nutr, 2003;78(4):734–41.
10. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al., A randomized trial of a lowcarbohydrate diet for obesity, N Engl J Med, 2003;348(21):2082–90.
11. Stern L, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al., The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conventional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med, 2004;140(10):778–85.
12. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al., Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A to Z weight loss study: a randomized trial, JAMA, 2007;297(9):969–77.
13. Miyashita Y, Koide N, Ohtsuka M, et al., Beneficial effect of low carbohydrate in low calorie diets on visceral fat reduction in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity, Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2004;65(3):235–41.
14. Larsen TM, Dalskov SM, van Baak M, et al., Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance, N Engl J Med, 2010;363(22):2102–13.
Share this Article
Related Content In Diabetes
Cardiorenal Syndrome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus – Rational Use of Sodium–glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors
European Endocrinology. 2020;16(2):113–21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2020.16.2.113
The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates that 463 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes, 90% of whom have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and expects the total healthcare expenditure on diabetes to reach US$ 845 billion by 2045 from US$ 760 billion in 2019.1 People with diabetes comprise 9.3% of the world’s adult population, and the […]
Short-term Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 Infection in People With or Without Metabolic Syndrome – Clearing Safety Issues and Good Clinical Practice
European Endocrinology. 2020;16(2):109–12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2020.16.2.109
Hydroxychloroquine has been in clinical use for decades, being extensively used by rheumatologists across the globe for different autoimmune disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and Sjögren‘s syndrome, among others), across all age groups and including during pregnancy. Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a pandemic sweeping […]
Managing Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic
European Endocrinology. 2020;16(2):85–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2020.16.2.85
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an occurring global public health crisis due to the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).1 In December of 2019, a low respiratory tract infection of unknown cause emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The Huanan seafood market was considered to be the main source of […]
Journal articles and more to your inbox
Get the latest clinical insights from touchENDOCRINOLOGYSign me up!